Eric Flores v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 10, 2019
Docket08-19-00177-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eric Flores v. State (Eric Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eric Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ ERIC FLORES, No. 08-19-00177-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § V. 120th District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# 20110D01621) §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eric Flores is attempting to appeal from a letter signed by the 120th District Court on

June 6, 2019 advising him that his conviction is final and “all Appellate relief must be pursued by

the proper vehicle.” We dismiss the attempted appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The Texas Constitution provides that a court of appeals has jurisdiction over “all cases of

which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such

restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law.” TEX.CONST. art. V, § 6(a). Article

44.02 provides that “[a] defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules

hereinafter prescribed . . . .” TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.02. Under Rule 25.2(a)(2), a

defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure Article

44.02 and the Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2). Generally, a court of

appeals only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991);

see State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)(noting the well-established

rule that a defendant’s general right to appeal under Article 44.02 is limited to appeal from a final

judgment). We have jurisdiction over other types of criminal appeals only when “expressly

granted by law.” McIntosh v. State, 110 S.W.3d 51, 52 (Tex.App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); see

Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008); Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 794.

On May 18, 2017, we issued an opinion and judgment affirming Appellant’s conviction of

burglary of a building in cause number 20110D01621. See Eric Flores v. State, No. 08-16-00025-

CR, 2017 WL 2180705 (Tex.App.—El Paso May 18, 2017, pet. ref’d). The trial judge’s letter

informing that his conviction is final, and she could not give him legal advice or appoint counsel

to represent him in post-conviction proceedings is not an appealable order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

July 10, 2019 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apolinar v. State
820 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
State v. Sellers
790 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
McIntosh v. State
110 S.W.3d 51 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eric Flores v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-flores-v-state-texapp-2019.