ERIC FARBER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ERIC FARBER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (ERIC FARBER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-475 Lower Tribunal No. F89-34205 ________________
Eric Farber, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.
Law Offices of Adam Farber, P.A., and Adam D. Farber (Boynton Beach); Law Offices of Ron M. Kleiner, Esq., and Ron M. Kleiner, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Eric Farber appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to be
relieved of his statutory duty to register as a sex offender. The trial court
conducted a hearing and denied the petition, announcing its exercise of
discretion in doing so. Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's
decision, we affirm.
An issue raised by appellant pertains to the application of Florida
Statute Section 943.0435 and amendments thereto. We decline
appellant’s invitation to opine as to whether the statute’s amendments
would preclude the appellant from filing a future petition to be removed
from the registry, as any such discussion would be advisory in nature.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ERIC FARBER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-farber-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.