Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United States

887 F.2d 1397, 64 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5855, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16299, 1989 WL 128513

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 1989

Docket88-2402

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 887 F.2d 1397 (Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United States, 887 F.2d 1397, 64 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5855, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16299, 1989 WL 128513 (10th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

The United States appeals from an order of the district court awarding damages of $1,000 to plaintiffs for negligent and unauthorized disclosure of their tax return information. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7431 (1982 & Supp. V 1987). After examining the briefs, record on appeal, and relevant case law, we AFFIRM the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Hyatt, 697 F.2d 899 (10th Cir.1983); Chandler v. United States, 687 F.Supp. 1515 (D.Utah 1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

The United States appeals from an order of the district court awarding damages of $1,000 to plaintiffs for negligent and unauthorized disclosure of their tax return information. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7431 (1982 & Supp. V 1987). After examining the briefs, record on appeal, and relevant case law, we AFFIRM the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Hyatt, 697 F.2d 899 (10th Cir.1983); Chandler v. United States, 687 F.Supp. 1515 (D.Utah 1988).

James G. Mallas Robert v. Jones, Jr., and John W. Flint Perry Brunk Peoples Supply Company, Incorporated Omega Energy, Incorporated Revel, Incorporated Trinity Properties, Incorporated Genesis Leases, Incorporated Star Cross Properties, Incorporated v. United States of America, and Alvin H. Kolak Joanne D. Miller William H. Ball Paul G. Topolka Jack D. Yarbrough Fred T. Goldberg, Jr. Alan I. Weinberg Larry L. Davis Robert Forrest Internal Revenue Service, James G. Mallas Robert v. Jones, Jr., and John W. Flint Perry Brunk Peoples Supply Company, Incorporated Omega Energy, Incorporated Revel, Incorporated Trinity Properties, Incorporated Genesis Leases, Incorporated Star Cross Properties, Incorporated v. United States of America, and Alvin H. Kolak Joanne D. Miller William H. Ball Paul G. Topolka Jack D. Yarbrough Fred T. Goldberg, Jr. Alan I. Weinberg Larry L. Davis Robert Forrest Internal Revenue Service

993 F.2d 1111 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Mallas v. United States

993 F.2d 1111 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Elvis E. Johnson v. Robert Sawyer, United States of America

980 F.2d 1490 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Johnson v. Sawyer

Fifth Circuit, 1992

Weiner v. Internal Revenue Service-Collections Division

789 F. Supp. 655 (S.D. New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

887 F.2d 1397, 64 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5855, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16299, 1989 WL 128513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-e-chandler-and-peggy-k-chandler-v-united-states-ca10-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack