Eric Drake v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance, and Travelers Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 20, 2013·No. 05-13-00170-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered August 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00170-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

CARMEN SIFUENTES, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03940

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 6, 2013 motion to produce. Appellant requests that this Court order the court reporter to produce audio tape recordings for four of the five volumes of reporter’s records. Appellant specifies only one alleged inaccuracy in volume two. The reporter’s record states: “And I would like to preserve for the appellate court any objections of the hearing for the record.” Appellant contends he actually said the following: “And I would like to preserve for the appellate court any objections of you hearing this TRO for the record.”

We do not find the single alleged inaccuracy to be of significance. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion without prejudice to filing a motion specifying any omission or inaccuracy of consequence.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric Drake v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance, and Travelers Indemnity Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Eric Drake v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance, and Travelers Indemnity Company (Eric Drake v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance, and Travelers Indemnity Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.