Eric Donald Jackson v. State of Florida

253 So. 3d 1249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2018
Docket17-3470
StatusPublished

This text of 253 So. 3d 1249 (Eric Donald Jackson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eric Donald Jackson v. State of Florida, 253 So. 3d 1249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-3470 _____________________________

ERIC DONALD JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.

September 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Eric Donald Jackson admitted to violating his probation and his corrected scoresheet reflected a total of 19 sentencing points. Pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes (2015), the trial court was required to sentence Jackson to a nonstate prison sanction. However, the trial court made written findings that Jackson could present a danger to the public if subject only to a nonprison sanction and sentenced Jackson to 5 years’ imprisonment. Jackson now raises a constitutional challenge to section 775.082(10), arguing that a jury, not a judge, is required to make the factual findings that were used to increase his punishment beyond the statutory maximum of a nonstate prison sanction. The outcome of this case is controlled by our recent decision in Booker v. State, 244 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). There, we held that section 775.082(10) was unconstitutional as it applied to Booker because it authorized the trial court to make factual findings that increased his maximum sentence from 1 year in county jail to 4 years in prison contrary to the holdings in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). Booker, 244 So. 3d at 1163-64; but see Brown v. State, 233 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), review granted by 2018 WL 2069393 (Fla. Apr. 9, 2018). Here, the trial court made factual findings that increased Jackson’s maximum sentence from 1 year in county jail to 5 years in prison. Thus, as required by our holding in Booker, we reverse Jackson’s sentence and remand for resentencing under the prior version of section 775.082(10).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Reginald Lee Booker, I I I v. State of Florida
244 So. 3d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 So. 3d 1249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-donald-jackson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.