Eric Daniel Maldonado v. State
This text of Eric Daniel Maldonado v. State (Eric Daniel Maldonado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00725-CR
Eric Daniel Maldonado, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2011-086, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Eric Daniel Maldonado has filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s
judgment revoking Maldonado’s deferred-adjudication community supervision and adjudicating him
guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance. The clerk’s record contains a trial-court
certification indicating that this is a plea-bargain case and that Maldonado has no right of appeal.
However, that certification relates to the original order of deferred adjudication. The record does
not contain a certification of Maldonado’s right to appeal the judgment adjudicating guilt.
The rules of appellate procedure provide, “The trial court shall enter a certification
of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.”
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, the district court is required to enter a written certification
of Maldonado’s right of appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt. See Durgan v. State,
240 S.W.3d 875, 877-78 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). We abate this cause and remand it to the district court for entry of a proper
certification of Maldonado’s right of appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt. See Dears
v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d
906, 909 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that case in which defendant pleads true to allegations
in motion to adjudicate is not considered plea-bargain case for purposes of rule 25.2(a)(2)). Once
entered, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with this Court
no later than May 20, 2013.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Abated
Filed: May 9, 2013
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eric Daniel Maldonado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-daniel-maldonado-v-state-texapp-2013.