Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 19, 2015·No. 05-14-01142-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered May 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01142-CV

ERIC C. HALL, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14789

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 15, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. Appellant filed a brief on May 4, 2015. In post-card notices dated May 5, 2015 and May 18, 2015, the Court informed appellant that the brief was not text searchable and not properly bookmarked and instructed appellant to file a corrected electronic brief that complies with rule of appellate procedure 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9. On May 18, 2015, this Court also notified appellant that the brief was deficient, set forth the specific deficiencies, and instructed appellant to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1.

We GRANT appellant’s motion TO THE EXTENT that appellant shall file an amended brief by JUNE 12, 2015 that complies with rules of appellate procedure 9 and 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9 & 38.1. We caution appellant that failure to file an amended brief that corrects the deficiencies and complies with the electronic filing requirements may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b) & (c).

Appellees’ brief will be due thirty days after appellant’s amended brief is filed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM (Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.