Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM
Opinion
Order entered May 19, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01142-CV
ERIC C. HALL, Appellant
V.
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14789
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s May 15, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a
brief. Appellant filed a brief on May 4, 2015. In post-card notices dated May 5, 2015 and May
18, 2015, the Court informed appellant that the brief was not text searchable and not properly
bookmarked and instructed appellant to file a corrected electronic brief that complies with rule of
appellate procedure 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9. On May 18, 2015, this Court also notified
appellant that the brief was deficient, set forth the specific deficiencies, and instructed appellant
to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1.
We GRANT appellant’s motion TO THE EXTENT that appellant shall file an amended
brief by JUNE 12, 2015 that complies with rules of appellate procedure 9 and 38.1. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 9 & 38.1. We caution appellant that failure to file an amended brief that corrects the deficiencies and complies with the electronic filing requirements may result in dismissal of the
appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b) & (c).
Appellees’ brief will be due thirty days after appellant’s amended brief is filed. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.6(b).
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM (Eric C. Hall v. Texas Workforce Commision and ABM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.