Eric Brown v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2009
Docket04-09-00292-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eric Brown v. State (Eric Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eric Brown v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00292-CR

Eric BROWN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. 08-11-222-CRW Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 16, 2009

DISMISSED

Defendant Eric Brown entered a plea of nolo contendere to the indictment and was

sentenced to fifty years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice. The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that

this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal . . . .” Appellant filed a

notice of appeal. The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain and the punishment assessed 04-09-00292-CR

did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant;

therefore, the trial court's certification accurately reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain

case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's

permission to appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written

motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to

appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the

right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly,

on July 17, 2009, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to

Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of

appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court

certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eric Brown v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-brown-v-state-texapp-2009.