Eric Bouldwin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 25, 2003
Docket07-02-00156-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eric Bouldwin v. State (Eric Bouldwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eric Bouldwin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-02-0156-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

FEBRUARY 25, 2003

______________________________

ERIC DARNELL BOULDWIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 873010; HONORABLE BELINDA HILL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.*

On April 19, 2001, upon his plea of guilty, appellant Eric Darnell Bouldwin was

adjudged guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance weighing more than

four grams but less than 200 grams. In accordance with a plea bargain, he was placed on

* John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). probation (community supervision) for a period of three years. On February 19, 2002, after

hearing, appellant’s probation was revoked and he was ordered to serve a three year

sentence in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice and in addition

was ordered to pay a fine of $500. Appellant gave timely notice of appeal from the

conviction.

On January 31, 2003, we received appellant’s motion to withdraw his notice of

appeal and to dismiss the appeal. His attorney joined in the motion. Because appellant’s

motion meets all the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), and

because this court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant’s motion, the

motion must be, and is hereby, granted.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motions for rehearing will

be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

John T. Boyd Senior Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eric Bouldwin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-bouldwin-v-state-texapp-2003.