Eric Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

485 F.3d 1053, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 416, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9288
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2007·No. 04-17295·Published

Opinion

485 F.3d 1053

Eric BATES; Bert Enos; Babaranti Oloyede; Eric Bumbala; Edward Williams, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., dba UPS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-17295.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 24, 2007.

Caroline A. Jacobs, Esq., Oakland, CA, Guy B. Wallace, Esq., Todd M. Schneider, Schneider & Wallace, San Francisco, CA, Laurence W. Paradis, Esq., Disability Rights Advocates, Berkeley, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Mark A. Perry, Esq., Christopher J. Martin, Esq., Susan B. Burr, Esq., Rachel A. Clark, Esq, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Prior report: 465 F.3d 1069 (2006)

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Wardlaw is recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 485 F.3d 1053, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 416, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9288 (9th Cir. 2007).

485 F.3d 1053 (Eric Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
465 F.3d 1069 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)