Eric Antonio Zachariah Anderson v. Tiffany Anderson
This text of Eric Antonio Zachariah Anderson v. Tiffany Anderson (Eric Antonio Zachariah Anderson v. Tiffany Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00283-CV ___________________________
ERIC ANTONIO ZACHARIAH ANDERSON, Appellant
V.
TIFFANY ANDERSON, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-000671-1
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Eric Antonio Zachariah Anderson attempts to appeal from a
March 9, 2023 judgment. On August 11, 2023, we sent the parties a letter, which
stated the following:
The court has received a copy of the notice of appeal in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(e). The court is concerned it may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. The trial court’s judgment was signed March 9, 2023. A motion to modify judgment was filed March 30, 2023. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due June 7, 2023, but was not filed until August 8, 2023.
Unless the appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal files with the court, on or before Monday, August 21, 2023, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.
Shortly thereafter, we received a suggestion of bankruptcy, and we stayed the case.
After the bankruptcy was dismissed and this appeal was reinstated, we sent the
parties a second letter similar to the one quoted above, giving them until
November 17, 2023, to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.
We have received no response.
The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a
timely filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex.
1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because the notice of
appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.
2 P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Samiei v. Am. Furukawa, Inc., No. 02-23-00076-CV, 2023 WL
2805899, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 6, 2023, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem.
op.).
Per Curiam
Delivered: January 11, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eric Antonio Zachariah Anderson v. Tiffany Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-antonio-zachariah-anderson-v-tiffany-anderson-texapp-2024.