Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush
This text of 259 A.D. 984 (Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defenses of usury and of offset and of non-ownership of the note in suit are available to the defendants without the bringing in of the proposed party defendant and the order appealed from should not have been granted. (Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth, 235 App. Div. 890; Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 2.) All concur. (The order allows defendants to bring in an additional party defendant in an action on a note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erhardt-v-stacy-bush-nyappdiv-1940.