Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush

259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540

This text of 259 A.D. 984 (Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush, 259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defenses of usury and of offset and of non-ownership of the note in suit are available to the defendants without the bringing in of the proposed party defendant and the order appealed from should not have been granted. (Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth, 235 App. Div. 890; Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 2.) All concur. (The order allows defendants to bring in an additional party defendant in an action on a note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth
235 A.D. 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erhardt-v-stacy-bush-nyappdiv-1940.