Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush

259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 1940·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defenses of usury and of offset and of non-ownership of the note in suit are available to the defendants without the bringing in of the proposed party defendant and the order appealed from should not have been granted. (Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth, 235 App. Div. 890; Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 2.) All concur. (The order allows defendants to bring in an additional party defendant in an action on a note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defenses of usury and of offset and of non-ownership of the note in suit are available to the defendants without the bringing in of the proposed party defendant and the order appealed from should not have been granted. (Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth, 235 App. Div. 890; Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 2.) All concur. (The order allows defendants to bring in an additional party defendant in an action on a note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush, 259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 984 (Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related