Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co.
86 N.Y.S. 1134
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. The case is distinguishable from Loretz v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 34 App. Div. 1, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1059, by reason of the fact that here the venue appears to have been laid by the plaintiff in Kings county by mistake, and it appears from the statement of counsel upon the argument that there was an understanding on the hearing that the plaintiff should be regarded as having moved to correct this mistake.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co., 86 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
86 N.Y.S. 1134 (Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loretz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
34 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Loretz v. Metropolitan St. Railway Co.
53 N.Y.S. 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)