Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co.

86 N.Y.S. 1134

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1134 (Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erhardt v. Pottier & Stymus Co., 86 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, without costs. The case is distinguishable from Loretz v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 34 App. Div. 1, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1059, by reason of the fact that here the venue appears to have been laid by the plaintiff in Kings county by mistake, and it appears from the statement of counsel upon the argument that there was an understanding on the hearing that the plaintiff should be regarded as having moved to correct this mistake.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, without costs. The case is distinguishable from Loretz v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 34 App. Div. 1, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1059, by reason of the fact that here the venue appears to have been laid by the plaintiff in Kings county by mistake, and it appears from the statement of counsel upon the argument that there was an understanding on the hearing that the plaintiff should be regarded as having moved to correct this mistake.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erhardt-v-pottier-stymus-co-nyappdiv-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack