Erhard v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
359 N.E.2d 66, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 770
Opinion
The case was properly decided on the authority of Koshland v. American Woolen Co. 289 Mass. 308, 311 (1935), and like cases. If there is to be any change in the rule expounded in those cases, it will have to come from the Legislature or the Supreme Judicial Court. See and compare McCoy, petitioner, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 893 (1974); Hampshire Nat’l Bank v. Calkins, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 697, 699 (1975).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erhard v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 359 N.E.2d 66, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 770 (Mass. Ct. App. 1977).
359 N.E.2d 66 (Erhard v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faneuil Investors Group, Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Selectmen
913 N.E.2d 908 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2009)