Erey v. Stresscon Industries
This text of 22 A.D.3d 249 (Erey v. Stresscon Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered February 9, 2005, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Terra Firma Construction Management for summary judgment on its claims for contractual and common-law indemnification from defendant-respondent JBF Construction, LLC, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was properly denied since there are questions of fact as to the roles Terra Firma and JBF undertook in the supervision of work at the job site, and, in particular, in the purchase and installation of the concrete plank that allegedly caused plaintiffs injuries. Additionally, review of the contract between Terra Firma and JBF, and, in particular, paragraphs 12.2 (concerning JBF’s indemnity obligations) and 12.3 (concerning whether the obligations undertaken by JBF can absolve other parties of liability for their negligence), does not lead to the conclusion that JBF’s duties to indemnify were unconditional. Indeed, Terra Firma may not be indemnified if a breach of duty by it resulted in plaintiffs harm (see General [250]*250Obligations Law § 5-322.1). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.3d 249, 802 N.Y.S.2d 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erey-v-stresscon-industries-nyappdiv-2005.