Erdman v. Hartung

41 A.D.2d 1015, 344 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4436

This text of 41 A.D.2d 1015 (Erdman v. Hartung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erdman v. Hartung, 41 A.D.2d 1015, 344 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term. We also note that defendant has failed to set forth any fact in support of his assertion that he has a defense to the account. (Accord Farmers Coop. v. Levine, 36 A D 2d 656; Beck v. Greinert, 29 A D 2d 712.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Special Term in action for breach of contract.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.D.2d 1015, 344 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erdman-v-hartung-nyappdiv-1973.