Erdman v. Hartung
This text of 41 A.D.2d 1015 (Erdman v. Hartung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term. We also note that defendant has failed to set forth any fact in support of his assertion that he has a defense to the account. (Accord Farmers Coop. v. Levine, 36 A D 2d 656; Beck v. Greinert, 29 A D 2d 712.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Special Term in action for breach of contract.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.D.2d 1015, 344 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erdman-v-hartung-nyappdiv-1973.