Erdei v. Unum Group

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED MARTIN ERDEI, □□□ DATE FILED: __7/8/2025 Plaintiff, 1:25-cv-1716-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNUM GROUP and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter stating that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 21]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and if the application to restore the action is made by August 8, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die.

Date: July 8, 2025 MARY VYSKOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge