Erdan v. Gizewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erdan v. Gizewski

248 A.D.2d 503, 669 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 503 (Erdan v. Gizewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erdan v. Gizewski, 248 A.D.2d 503, 669 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 19, 1997, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the complaint sufficiently stated causes of action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; 3016 [b]).

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 19, 1997, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the complaint sufficiently stated causes of action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; 3016 [b]).

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 503, 669 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erdan-v-gizewski-nyappdiv-1998.