Ercolani v. Sam & Al Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ercolani v. Sam & Al Realty Co.

24 A.D.2d 589, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 589 (Ercolani v. Sam & Al Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ercolani v. Sam & Al Realty Co., 24 A.D.2d 589, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, Joseph M. Vucker and two other “applicants to intervene” appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 19, 1965, which: (a) denied their application to intervene; and (b) on plaintiff’s motion, confirmed the Referee’s report of sale. Order affirmed, with one bill of $30 costs and disbursements to all the respondents. The applicants seeking intervention are [590]*590too remoto from this foreclosure action. Their claim on flic, proceeds of the sale is contingent and miad,indicated. Christ,, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, Joseph M. Vucker and two other “applicants to intervene” appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 19, 1965, which: (a) denied their application to intervene; and (b) on plaintiff’s motion, confirmed the Referee’s report of sale. Order affirmed, with one bill of $30 costs and disbursements to all the respondents. The applicants seeking intervention are [590]*590too remoto from this foreclosure action. Their claim on flic, proceeds of the sale is contingent and miad,indicated. Christ,, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, J J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 589, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ercolani-v-sam-al-realty-co-nyappdiv-1965.