Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile

768 P.2d 946, 95 Or. App. 400

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 22, 1989

DocketWCB 86-05134; CA A47689

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 768 P.2d 946 (Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 768 P.2d 946, 95 Or. App. 400 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, we review for substantial evidence. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). The Board’s order is sufficient for review, there is substantial evidence to support its findings, and its reasoning connects those findings to the conclusion. Therefore, we hold that the Board did not err in reversing the referee’s award of permanent total disability.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, we review for substantial evidence. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). The Board’s order is sufficient for review, there is substantial evidence to support its findings, and its reasoning connects those findings to the conclusion. Therefore, we hold that the Board did not err in reversing the referee’s award of permanent total disability.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 P.2d 946, 95 Or. App. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erck-v-brown-oldsmobile-orctapp-1989.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack