Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Erceg v. State

Erceg v. State

697 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8800, 1997 WL 429019
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1997
DocketNo. 96-3470
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 697 So. 2d 572 (Erceg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erceg v. State, 697 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8800, 1997 WL 429019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found that the appellant had violated his probation by loitering and prowling contrary to the condition of his probation that he not violate any law. The state concedes that the record does not support a finding of guilt as to the charge of loitering and prowling, because the offense did not occur in the presence of a police officer. Freeman v. State, 617 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We therefore reverse and remand for the reinstatement of appellant’s probation.

STONE, C.J., and WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. State
854 So. 2d 240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8800, 1997 WL 429019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erceg-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.