E.R.B. v. A.M.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

E.R.B. v. A.M.K.

561 S.W.3d 483

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106400

StatusPublished

This text of 561 S.W.3d 483 (E.R.B. v. A.M.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E.R.B. v. A.M.K., 561 S.W.3d 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A.M.K. appeals the trial court's judgment and decree of paternity that awarded her and S.L.B. joint physical custody and joint legal custody of the parties' child. Finding that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A.M.K. appeals the trial court's judgment and decree of paternity that awarded her and S.L.B. joint physical custody and joint legal custody of the parties' child. Finding that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 S.W.3d 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erb-v-amk-moctapp-2018.