Erb

Court of Claims

Erb

149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 3, 1960

DocketNo. 227-57

StatusPublished

This text of 149 Ct. Cl. 836 (Erb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erb, 149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98 (cc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Military pay; retired pay. Upon consideration of a report by the trial commissioner and the briefs and oral argument by the parties, it was ordered that pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1372 plaintiff is not entitled to the retired pay as a major but that on the basis of the decisions by this court in Tracy v. United States, 136 C. Cls. 211; Budd v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 123, and Lowell v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 111, plaintiff is entitled to the retired pay of a captain for the subject period. On May 20, 1960, judgment was entered for plaintiff for $15,621.61.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Military pay; retired pay. Upon consideration of a report by the trial commissioner and the briefs and oral argument by the parties, it was ordered that pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1372 plaintiff is not entitled to the retired pay as a major but that on the basis of the decisions by this court in Tracy v. United States, 136 C. Cls. 211; Budd v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 123, and Lowell v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 111, plaintiff is entitled to the retired pay of a captain for the subject period. On May 20, 1960, judgment was entered for plaintiff for $15,621.61.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erb-cc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack