Erath v. Glenn
101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 795, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 166
This text of 101 P. 1133 (Erath v. Glenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Erath v. Glenn, 101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 795, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 166 (kan 1909).
Opinion
The point of contention here is, Was there evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court that the defendant had notice of the commencement and pendency of the original action? It appears from the record that there was at least sufficient evidence to uphold the finding. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 795, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erath-v-glenn-kan-1909.