Erasmo Garcia v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 9, 2013·No. 05-12-01667-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered August 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01666-CR

No. 05-12-01667-CR

ERASMO GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-58343-Y, F10-61584-Y

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On July 8, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and is represented by court-appointed counsel Nanette Hendrickson; (3) Ms. Hendrickson’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) Ms. Hendrickson requested thirty days from the August 6, 2013 hearing to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by SEPTEMBER 5, 2013. Because counsel has already been granted one extension and the brief is now two months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If the brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Nanette Hendrickson and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office removed as counsel and will order the trial court to appoint a new attorney to represent appellant in this appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Michael Snipes, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Katherine Drew, Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; Nanette Hendrickson, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erasmo Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Erasmo Garcia v. State (Erasmo Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.