Erambert v. Scarborough

46 Ga. 398
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 Ga. 398 (Erambert v. Scarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erambert v. Scarborough, 46 Ga. 398 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

Montgomery, Judge.

Article Y. section 3 and paragraph 3 of the Constitution gives the Court authority to render judgment, without the verdict of a jury in all civil cases founded on contract, where an issuable defense is not filed on oath. Section 13 of the same article provides that the right of trial by jury, except where it is otherwise provided in this Constitution, shall remain inviolate. Before the Constitution, cases like the present in the Superior Court were tried by jury. That mode of trial must “remain inviolate/7 except where “an issuable defense is not filed on oath.77

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redding v. Commonwealth of America, Inc.
237 S.E.2d 689 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Cates v. Duncan
183 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Jowers & Son v. Kirkpatrick Hardware Co.
94 S.E. 1044 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ga. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erambert-v-scarborough-ga-1872.