Erace v. Erace

710 So. 2d 227, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1998 WL 236271
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2151
StatusPublished

This text of 710 So. 2d 227 (Erace v. Erace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erace v. Erace, 710 So. 2d 227, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1998 WL 236271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having examined the briefs of the parties, the record, and heard oral argument of counsel, we fail to find an abuse of discretion in the trial court rulings and denial of the husband’s motion for relief from the final judgment of dissolution.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 So. 2d 227, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1998 WL 236271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erace-v-erace-fladistctapp-1998.