Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp

13 N.W.2d 88, 244 Wis. 587, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 275
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

When the motion for nonsuit was made the evidence showed that plaintiff by reason of its acts had become a tenant holding over its term under sec. 348.11, Stats., and that the landlord had a right of re-entry. Peaceable entry having been made and the tenant’s goods removed and stored subject to the tenant’s orders, the order for non-suit was properly granted. However, as no judgment was entered and because the order is not an appealable order, the appeal must be dismissed.

By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp, 13 N.W.2d 88, 244 Wis. 587, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 275 (Wis. 1944).

13 N.W.2d 88 (Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fredrick v. City of Janesville
285 N.W.2d 655 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)