Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp

13 N.W.2d 88, 244 Wis. 587, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 275

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 18, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.W.2d 88 (Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Era Club, Inc. v. Rupp, 13 N.W.2d 88, 244 Wis. 587, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 275 (Wis. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

When the motion for nonsuit was made the evidence showed that plaintiff by reason of its acts had become a tenant holding over its term under sec. 348.11, Stats., and that the landlord had a right of re-entry. Peaceable entry having been made and the tenant’s goods removed and stored subject to the tenant’s orders, the order for non-suit was properly granted. However, as no judgment was entered and because the order is not an appealable order, the appeal must be dismissed.

By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild, J.

When the motion for nonsuit was made the evidence showed that plaintiff by reason of its acts had become a tenant holding over its term under sec. 348.11, Stats., and that the landlord had a right of re-entry. Peaceable entry having been made and the tenant’s goods removed and stored subject to the tenant’s orders, the order for non-suit was properly granted. However, as no judgment was entered and because the order is not an appealable order, the appeal must be dismissed.

By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.W.2d 88, 244 Wis. 587, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/era-club-inc-v-rupp-wis-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack