ER Propco Craig, LLC v. Yulanda Shnell Campbell
This text of ER Propco Craig, LLC v. Yulanda Shnell Campbell (ER Propco Craig, LLC v. Yulanda Shnell Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00059-CV
ER PROPCO CRAIG, LLC, APPELLANT
V.
YULANDA SHNELL CAMPBELL, ET AL., APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 111370-E-CV, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding
April 17, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, ER Propco Craig, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s order denying its
motion to dismiss pursuant to section 74.351 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
Now pending before this Court is Appellant’s motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the
appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party
from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court
has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs,
costs will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for
rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ER Propco Craig, LLC v. Yulanda Shnell Campbell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/er-propco-craig-llc-v-yulanda-shnell-campbell-texapp-2024.