Equity Trust Company v. Martin

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedAugust 19, 2022
Docket1:22-cv-01004
StatusUnknown

This text of Equity Trust Company v. Martin (Equity Trust Company v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equity Trust Company v. Martin, (N.D. Ohio 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, Case No. 1:22-cv-01004

Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE DAVID A. RUIZ

DEANNA MARTIN, et al., ORDER Defendants.

On July 26, 2022, Plaintiff Equity Trust Company (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants “[p]ursuant to Rule 55(a)-(b).” (R. 10). Obtaining default judgment is a two-step process. Shoemake v. Mansfield City Sch., No. 1:13CV2505, 2015 WL 13810793, at *3 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2015) (“Under this Rule, default is a two-step process with entry of default as the first procedural step, after defendants have been properly served but failed to plead or otherwise defend.”). Plaintiff’s motion conflates these two steps, but “[a]n entry of default and a default judgment are distinct concepts which must be treated separately.” Northland Ins. Co. v. Cailu Title Corp., 204 F.R.D. 327, 330 (W.D. Mich. 2000) ((quoting United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc., 392 F. Supp. 944, 950 (N.D. Ind. 1975)); accord ArmorSource LLC v. Kapah, No. 2:18-CV- 905, 2019 WL 1039748, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2019). An application for entry of default to the clerk of courts is the first step under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Where a defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend the action, the application to the clerk of court is a prerequisite to the entry of a default judgment. Yang Zhang v. Clevenger, No. 1:15 CV 0720, 2015 WL 4644645, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 4, 2015) (citing Johnson v. Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998)). The distinction is not merely semantic. Given the posture in which Plaintiff has submitted the motion, the clerk’s office cannot enter default. The motion seeks

more than just an entry of default, as it seeks default judgment itself along with compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. Conversely, the Court cannot grant the motion for default judgment without the prior entry of default by the clerk. “[N]o default judgment may be entered under either F.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(1) or (b)(2) unless a default has previously been entered by the clerk under 55(a). Thus, the entry of default is an essential predicate to any default judgment.” DeTore v. Loc. No. 245 of Jersey City Pub. Emp. Union, 511 F. Supp. 171, 176 (D.N.J. 1981); accord Brantley v. Runyon, No. C-1-96-842, 1997 WL 373739, at *1 (S.D. Ohio June 19, 1997) (denying motion to enter a default judgment against defendants where the plaintiff did not first obtain an entry of default from the clerk).1

1 The Court also notes that Plaintiff did not specify whether it was seeking default judgment under Rule 55(b)(1) by the clerk or pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) by the Court. The former may only be sought where it is for a sum certain and where a plaintiff indicates which of multiple counts it seeks default judgment for. Nat’l Auto Grp., Inc. v. Van Devere, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-2543, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88508, at *3 (N.D. Ohio May 10, 2021) (Lioi, J.) (finding that a request for attorney fees was not a sum certain and could not be considered by the clerk under Rule 55(b)(1)). “A case is either for a ‘sum certain’ or not. A party must choose one of the two procedures offered by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)[.]” Conetta v. Nat'l Hair Care Ctrs., Inc., 186 F.R.D. 262, 268 (D. R.I. 1999), aff’d, 236 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 2001); accord Van Zeeland Oil Co. v. Lawrence Agency, No. 2:09-cv-150, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146105, at *3-4 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 28, 2009). 2 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (R. 10) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff must first seek and obtain an entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) before filing a motion for default judgment under 55(b)(1) or 55(b)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ David A. Ruiz DAVID A. RUIZ Date: August 19, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conetta v. National Hair Care Centers, Inc.
236 F.3d 67 (First Circuit, 2001)
DeTore v. Local 245 of Jersey City Public Employees Union
511 F. Supp. 171 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.
392 F. Supp. 944 (N.D. Indiana, 1975)
Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.
140 F.3d 781 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Conetta v. National Hair Care Centers, Inc.
186 F.R.D. 262 (D. Rhode Island, 1999)
Northland Insurance v. Cailu Title Corp.
204 F.R.D. 327 (W.D. Michigan, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Equity Trust Company v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equity-trust-company-v-martin-ohnd-2022.