Equity Title, LLC v. Profyt Addyct, LLC
This text of Equity Title, LLC v. Profyt Addyct, LLC (Equity Title, LLC v. Profyt Addyct, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 || MARILYN FINE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5949 2 || E-mail: mfine@nevadafirm.com HOLLEY DRIGGS 3 || 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 4 || Telephone: 702/791-0308 Facsimile: 702/791-1912 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 || EQUITY TITLE, LLC, doing business as 7 || EQUITY TITLE OF NEVADA, 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12 || EQUITY TITLE, LLC, doing business as CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01639-APG-BNW EQUITY TITLE OF NEVADA, 13 Plaintiff, NOTICE OF EMERGENCY MOTION 14 AND EMERGENCY MOTION FOR — vs. EXPEDITED DISCOVERY; 15 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON > 16 |} PROFYT ADDYCT, LLC, and STEVEN GAZLAY, an individual, and DOES 1 through 17 || 10 inclusive, 18 Defendants. — 19 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff EQUITY TITLE, LLC, doing business as EQUITY 21 || TITLE OF NEVADA (‘Plaintiff’), will and hereby does move on an emergency basis, as soon as — 22 ||this matter can be heard, for a court order granting Plaintiff expedited discovery by Rule 45 23 || subpoena to non-party Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”). This emergency motion is made pursuant 24 || to Local Rules 7-2 and 7-4, and is based upon the following Memorandum in support, the 25 || Declarations of Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel filed in support of this Motion, the Complaint of the 26 /// 27 /// 28 ///
] || Plaintiff, all of the filings, records and proceedings herein, and Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil 9 || Procedure. 3 Dated this 11" day of September. 4 5 HOLLEY DRIGGS 6 /s/ Marilyn Fine 7 MARILYN FINE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5949 8 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Y 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Equity Title, LLC. 10 doing business as Equity Title of Nevada 11
> 16
18 19 * 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 2:20-cv-01639
1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 As set forth in the Complaint and the Declarations in support of this Motion, Defendants 3 || Steven Gazlay (“Gazlay”), and his purported Limited Liability Company Profyt Addyct, LLC, have 4 || committed title fraud and wire fraud in addition to violating the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt 5 || Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (“RICO”). 6 At the end of last month Gazlay presented falsified corporate records to Plaintiff, a title and 7 || escrow company, and a lender, purporting to own residential real property located in Las Vegas, 8 || and thereby causing a fraudulent wire transfer in the amount of $707,375.75 to the BofA account 9 || ending in 8373; an account which Gazlay controls. While attempts to seize the fraudulent loan 10 || proceeds have been made by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s Financial Crimes rh 11 || Division, (Incident Number LLV20090002464), Gazlay has already accessed and attempted to ~ 12 || further transfer and conceal from recovery significant portions of the loan proceeds. 13 Because Rule 45 subpoenas are subject to the same scheduling orders as other forms of 14 || discovery, see Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc., 177 F.R.D. 443, (D.Minn. — 15 || 1997), through this Emergency Motion for Expedited Discovery, Plaintiff seeks leave to > 16 || immediately issue a Rule 45 subpoena upon BofA to obtain information related to the receipt and 17 || further withdrawal or transfer of the loan proceeds, for the purpose of tracing and ultimately seeking 18 || to recover said funds. The court may authorize discovery before the Rule 26(f) meeting for “good 19 || cause,” where the need for early and limited discovery outweighs any possible prejudice to the party O 20 || from whom discovery is sought. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc. 208 F.R.D. 273, 21 || 276 (N.D. Cal. 2002). 992 “Good cause” exists here in that Plaintiff must first learn where Gazlay has transferred the 23 || loan proceeds before Plaintiff can seek injunctive relief related to the location of the transferred 24 || funds. Here the funds themselves are evidence and may be consumed or destroyed by Gazlay before 25 ||a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may be sought. 26 /// 27 28 | ///
1 This is a specific and limited discovery request where there is no alternative means of 2 || obtaining the information, and the adverse party, here the perpetrator of the fraud, has no compelling 3 || privacy interest in the information. 4 Dated this 11" day of September. 5 HOLLEY DRIGGS 6 /s/ Marilyn Fine 7 MARILYN FINE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5949 8 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Y 9 rh Attorneys for Plaintiff Equity Title, LLC. 10 doing business as Equity Title of Nevada rh lil Y _, 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 Having considered the foregoing emergency motion and the matters stated therein, IT IS 14 || HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff be permitted to issue a Rule 45 subpoena to Bank of America, — . 15 || N.A., pertaining to the account number ending in 8373. The Court finds that there is good 16 cause to grant the motion.
(1) 17 1 IT IS SO ORDERED _) 19 DATED: September 11, 2020
21 qa 23 BRENDA WEKSLER 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 4 Case No. 2:20-cv-01639
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Equity Title, LLC v. Profyt Addyct, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equity-title-llc-v-profyt-addyct-llc-nvd-2020.