Equity Income Partners, Lp v. Chicago Title Insurance Comp.

679 F. App'x 585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 2017
Docket14-15388
StatusUnpublished

This text of 679 F. App'x 585 (Equity Income Partners, Lp v. Chicago Title Insurance Comp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equity Income Partners, Lp v. Chicago Title Insurance Comp., 679 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

On July 12, 2016, we certified the following questions of law to the Arizona Su *586 preme Court pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat, § 12-1862:

1. When a lender purchases property by full-credit bid at a trustee’s sale, does Section 9 [of the standard form lender’s title insurance policies] apply, or does Section 2 apply?
2. Is a full-credit bid at a trustee’s sale a “payment” or “payment[] made” under Sections 2 or 9 of the policies?
3. To what extent does a full-credit bid at a trustee’s sale either (a) terminate coverage under Section 2(a)(i) of the policies, or (b) reduce coverage under Section 2 and any possible liability under Section 7?

Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chi Title Ins. Co., 828 F.3d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 2016).

On February 7, 2017, the Arizona Supreme Court answered the certified questions as follows:

1. Section 2 applies when a lender purchases property by full-credit bid at a trustee’s sale.
2. A full-credit bid at a trustee’s sale is not a “payment” under Sections 2 or 9 of the policy.
3. The full-credit bid neither terminates nor reduces coverage under Section 2 or Section 7. 1

Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 241 Ariz. 334, 387 P.3d 1263, 1264-65 (2017).

In light of the Arizona Supreme Court’s answers to the certified questions, we vacate the district court’s summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with those answers. Costs are awarded to appellants. Fed. R. App. P. 39(a).

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. The footnote in the Arizona Supreme Court opinion stated:

As explained below, the trustee sale may reduce or even eliminate a title insurer's ultimate liability under its policy. However, this reduction or elimination is not a function of the credit bid amount. Rather, the amount of the reduction, if any, is the fair market value of the property the lender receives as a result of its credit bid or, if the property is acquired by a third party, the amount that party pays for the property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.
387 P.3d 1263 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 F. App'x 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equity-income-partners-lp-v-chicago-title-insurance-comp-ca9-2017.