Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Feigenbaum

672 F. App'x 13
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2016
DocketNo. 16-7060
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 672 F. App'x 13 (Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Feigenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Feigenbaum, 672 F. App'x 13 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs and arguments of the parties, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Appellant Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC appeals the District Court’s rulings denying its motions to remand the case and vacate the arbitration award, and granting appellees’ motion to confirm the arbitration award. We affirm for the reasons stated in the District Court’s thorough and well-reasoned opinion. Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, P.C., 177 F.Supp.3d 197, 199 (D.D.C. 2016).

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven.days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Saint Paul
338 Conn. 651 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)
Ray v. Chafetz
236 F. Supp. 3d 66 (District of Columbia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 F. App'x 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equitas-disability-advocates-llc-v-feigenbaum-cadc-2016.