Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Waller

659 So. 2d 490, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258, 1995 WL 516452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 1995·No. No. 95-1675·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Although the factual predicate presented below creates a close question of law, we conclude that the motion and supporting affidavits are legally sufficient to state a reasonable fear on the part of petitioner that petitioner would not receive a fair hearing or trial before the currently assigned judge. We do not credit the principal contention of respondents Crittenden and Langley that the motion to disqualify was untimely filed. See Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.160(e). It was promptly filed after this judge was formally assigned. Accordingly, the writ of prohibition is issued.

WRIT GRANTED.

GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Waller, 659 So. 2d 490, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258, 1995 WL 516452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 490 (Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Waller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gentry v. State
659 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)