Equitable Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wille

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Equitable Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wille

34 A.D.2d 755, 311 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 755 (Equitable Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wille) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Equitable Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wille, 34 A.D.2d 755, 311 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments dismissing petitions entered December 4, 1969, and January 30, 1970, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. The dismissal of the petitions herein is upon the ground that the petitions failed to allege any facts that would show the determinations of respon[756]*756dent Superintendent of Banks to have been arbitrary or capricious. We have considered the petitions on the merits and do not pass upon the question of whether petitioner has standing to question the approval of respondent. In that connection the affirmance by this court without opinion (20 A D 2d 682) of Matter of Franklin Nat. Bank v. Superintendent of Banks (40 Mise 2d 565) does not necessarily indorse the Special Term holding that the petitioners there had no standing. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments dismissing petitions entered December 4, 1969, and January 30, 1970, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. The dismissal of the petitions herein is upon the ground that the petitions failed to allege any facts that would show the determinations of respon[756]*756dent Superintendent of Banks to have been arbitrary or capricious. We have considered the petitions on the merits and do not pass upon the question of whether petitioner has standing to question the approval of respondent. In that connection the affirmance by this court without opinion (20 A D 2d 682) of Matter of Franklin Nat. Bank v. Superintendent of Banks (40 Mise 2d 565) does not necessarily indorse the Special Term holding that the petitioners there had no standing. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 755, 311 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equitable-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-wille-nyappdiv-1970.