Equitable Beneficial Assn. v. Scott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Equitable Beneficial Assn. v. Scott

82 Pa. Super. 103, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 244

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 4, 1923

DocketAppeal, 109

StatusPublished

This text of 82 Pa. Super. 103 (Equitable Beneficial Assn. v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Equitable Beneficial Assn. v. Scott, 82 Pa. Super. 103, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 244 (Pa. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the refusal to open a judgment in ejectment entered pursuant to alease. Defendant denied that she executed the lease, and averred that she was in possession under an oral arrangement whose terms need not now be stated. Her allegations were put in issue and both parties filed depositions. Two subscribing witnesses testified that defendant executed the lease in their presence; she testified that what purported to be so was not in fact her signature. Without referring to the other evidence in the case it is sufficient to say there is nothing indicating any abuse of judicial discretion in discharging the rule to open.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the refusal to open a judgment in ejectment entered pursuant to alease. Defendant denied that she executed the lease, and averred that she was in possession under an oral arrangement whose terms need not now be stated. Her allegations were put in issue and both parties filed depositions. Two subscribing witnesses testified that defendant executed the lease in their presence; she testified that what purported to be so was not in fact her signature. Without referring to the other evidence in the case it is sufficient to say there is nothing indicating any abuse of judicial discretion in discharging the rule to open.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Pa. Super. 103, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equitable-beneficial-assn-v-scott-pasuperct-1923.