Equidyne Corp. v. Vogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Equidyne Corp. v. Vogel

160 A.D.2d 389, 554 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 160 A.D.2d 389 (Equidyne Corp. v. Vogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Equidyne Corp. v. Vogel, 160 A.D.2d 389, 554 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Klein, J.), entered on or about December 21, 1987, which, following an inquest to assess damages as against defendant R. L. Vogel, Inc. (Vogel), refused to award plaintiffs monetary damages against said defendant on the ground of plaintiffs’ failure to prove damages specifically attributable to Vogel, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff, as syndicators of tax shelter ventures, sued various defendants, including Vogel, to recover damages for alleged diversion of large sums of money raised by plaintiff Equidyne Corporation from private investors and supposedly channeled [390]*390to defendants to engage in coal-mining operations in the western Maryland region in the late 1970’s. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint, inter alia, that defendants conspired fraudulently to misrepresent the capabilities of their coal-mining operations and, further, wrongfully to convert investor moneys and other assets. Upon defendant Vogel’s default in answering the complaint, the claims against said defendant were severed from those of the remaining defendants, and an inquest to determine damages as against Vogel held.

The court took testimony on three occasions and the record supports the finding that plaintiffs failed to sustain their burden of establishing damages attributable to Vogel. Indeed, plaintiffs’ witnesses at the inquest, when pressed on cross-examination, were unable to present any evidence linking Vogel to the coal-mining ventures. Moreover, it is notable that Vogel is not mentioned in the syndicators’ offering memorandum.

Plaintiffs’ claims brought pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 USC § 1962), although cognizable in this State’s courts, are meritless in view of the insufficiency of factual proof establishing Vogel’s participation in the alleged conspiracy.

Finally, plaintiffs’ exhibits 5 through 12, which plaintiffs attempted to offer in evidence under the business record exception, were properly excluded. By plaintiffs’ own admission, the exhibits, which consisted of financial summaries, were prepared not in the ordinary course of business, but rather, in anticipation of the inquest on damages. (See, CPLR 4518.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Klein, J.), entered on or about December 21, 1987, which, following an inquest to assess damages as against defendant R. L. Vogel, Inc. (Vogel), refused to award plaintiffs monetary damages against said defendant on the ground of plaintiffs’ failure to prove damages specifically attributable to Vogel, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff, as syndicators of tax shelter ventures, sued various defendants, including Vogel, to recover damages for alleged diversion of large sums of money raised by plaintiff Equidyne Corporation from private investors and supposedly channeled [390]*390to defendants to engage in coal-mining operations in the western Maryland region in the late 1970’s. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint, inter alia, that defendants conspired fraudulently to misrepresent the capabilities of their coal-mining operations and, further, wrongfully to convert investor moneys and other assets. Upon defendant Vogel’s default in answering the complaint, the claims against said defendant were severed from those of the remaining defendants, and an inquest to determine damages as against Vogel held.

The court took testimony on three occasions and the record supports the finding that plaintiffs failed to sustain their burden of establishing damages attributable to Vogel. Indeed, plaintiffs’ witnesses at the inquest, when pressed on cross-examination, were unable to present any evidence linking Vogel to the coal-mining ventures. Moreover, it is notable that Vogel is not mentioned in the syndicators’ offering memorandum.

Plaintiffs’ claims brought pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 USC § 1962), although cognizable in this State’s courts, are meritless in view of the insufficiency of factual proof establishing Vogel’s participation in the alleged conspiracy.

Finally, plaintiffs’ exhibits 5 through 12, which plaintiffs attempted to offer in evidence under the business record exception, were properly excluded. By plaintiffs’ own admission, the exhibits, which consisted of financial summaries, were prepared not in the ordinary course of business, but rather, in anticipation of the inquest on damages. (See, CPLR 4518.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D.2d 389, 554 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equidyne-corp-v-vogel-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack