Equan Tario Forehand v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Equan Tario Forehand v. State of Florida

175 So. 3d 932

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 2015

Docket1D14-3782

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 932 (Equan Tario Forehand v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Equan Tario Forehand v. State of Florida, 175 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions in this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). But we remand to the lower court for entry of a corrected judgment of conviction conforming to the jury verdicts. The judgment currently reflects convictions on Counts 1 and 2 of aggravated assault by threat with a firearm — actual possession of a firearm without discharge, and on Count 3 of attempted robbery with a deadly weapon. The verdict form shows the jury actually found Appellant guilty on Count 1 of aggravated assault with a fire arm — no actual possession of a firearm, a third-degree felony; see sections 784.021(2), 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2013); on Count 2 of improper exhibition of a firearm, a first-degree misdemeanor; see section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2013); and on Count 3 of attempted robbery with a firearm — no actual possession of a firearm, a second-degree felony; see sections 812.13(2)(a), 777.04(4)(c), 775.082(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2013).

No sentencing errors were preserved for appeal. Therefore, we affirm Appellant’s sentences, as well, but without prejudice to his right to seek postconviction relief. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions in this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). But we remand to the lower court for entry of a corrected judgment of conviction conforming to the jury verdicts. The judgment currently reflects convictions on Counts 1 and 2 of aggravated assault by threat with a firearm — actual possession of a firearm without discharge, and on Count 3 of attempted robbery with a deadly weapon. The verdict form shows the jury actually found Appellant guilty on Count 1 of aggravated assault with a fire arm — no actual possession of a firearm, a third-degree felony; see sections 784.021(2), 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2013); on Count 2 of improper exhibition of a firearm, a first-degree misdemeanor; see section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2013); and on Count 3 of attempted robbery with a firearm — no actual possession of a firearm, a second-degree felony; see sections 812.13(2)(a), 777.04(4)(c), 775.082(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2013).

No sentencing errors were preserved for appeal. Therefore, we affirm Appellant’s sentences, as well, but without prejudice to his right to seek postconviction relief. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 3d 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equan-tario-forehand-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack