Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
311 F.3d 1132
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2002·No. Nos. 01-15410, 01-15976 and 01-15977·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion filed September 20, 2002, is amended as follows:
Slip opinion at 14626 [306 F.3d 794], first full paragraph, line 16, delete “so we affirm the judgment as to them.”
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Rymer voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Canby and Bertelsman so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 311 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2002).
311 F.3d 1132 (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.