EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAX COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee

856 F.2d 722, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18058, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,506, 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAX COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee. Read the opinion of the Court — 848 F.2d 526
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 20, 1988·No. 87-4659·Published

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAYIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAX COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee, 856 F.2d 722, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18058, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,506, 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 112 (5th Cir. 1988).

856 F.2d 722 (EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAX COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.