EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant

688 F.2d 951, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25498, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,051, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1441
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1982
Docket79-1515
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 688 F.2d 951 (EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant, 688 F.2d 951, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25498, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,051, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1441 (4th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In EEOC v. Ford Motor Co., 645 F.2d 183 (4 Cir. 1981), a case instituted by EEOC under Title VII, we affirmed a judgment of the district court finding discrimination in employment by refusal to hire, practiced against ten women, including applicants Judy Gaddis and Rebecca Starr, and remanded the case to the district court to consider further remedies. The judgment of the district court awarded back pay to the women- against whom discrimination had been practiced.

On review of our decision in Ford Motor Company v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 3057, 73 L.Ed.2d 721 (1982), our holding with regard to the amount of back pay awarded to Gaddis and Starr was reversed but in other respects our decision was not disturbed. With respect to Gaddis and Starr, the Court held that “absent special circumstances”, neither was entitled to back pay after the date in 1973 when Ford offered them employment.

In obedience to the mandate of the Court, we amend our former judgment by vacating the back pay awards to Gaddis and Starr and remanding their claims to the district court for reconsideration and re-computation in accordance with the Court’s

decision in Ford Motor Company. In all other respects our judgment is unchanged. Costs shall be equally divided between the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sam Teague, Ltd. v. Hawai'i Civil Rights Commission
971 P.2d 1104 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
Gaworski v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.
17 F.3d 1104 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
World Mart, Inc. v. Ditsch
855 P.2d 1228 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)
Sims v. Mme. Paulette Dry Cleaners
638 F. Supp. 224 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Bonura v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA
629 F. Supp. 353 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Donovan v. George Lai Contracting, Ltd.
629 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Missouri, 1985)
Sawyer v. Swift & Co.
610 F. Supp. 38 (D. Kansas, 1985)
Airport Inn, Inc. v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission
353 N.W.2d 727 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
McDowell v. Avtex Fibers, Inc.
740 F.2d 214 (Third Circuit, 1984)
Craig v. Y & Y Snacks, Inc.
721 F.2d 77 (Third Circuit, 1983)
Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental Health
714 F.2d 614 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 F.2d 951, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25498, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,051, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-appellee-v-ford-motor-company-ca4-1982.