Epton v. Hogan
355 F.2d 203
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 14, 1966·No. No. 194, Docket 29941·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Appellants’ complaint, concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of New York Penal Law § 161 and other statutes, was dismissed with leave to amend. An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order and therefore not appealable. See Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co., Inc., 144 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944); American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Co., 121 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1941); 6 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 54.12[1] at 116 (1953).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epton v. Hogan, 355 F.2d 203 (2d Cir. 1966).
355 F.2d 203 (Epton v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of Regents
310 S.E.2d 675 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1983)
Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.
590 F.2d 445 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Weisman v. LeLandais
532 F.2d 308 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Lawrence I. Weisman on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of James L. Weisman v. Pierre J. Lelandais, Rosemary T. Franciscus v. Pierre J. Lelandais and Sheila C. Weisman
532 F.2d 308 (Second Circuit, 1976)
James Haskin v. Henry R. Morton, Etc.
456 F.2d 1071 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)