Epstein v. Water Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Epstein v. Water Taxi, Inc.

13 A.D.2d 480, 212 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 480 (Epstein v. Water Taxi, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epstein v. Water Taxi, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 480, 212 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September 28, 1960 denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for reconsideration of an order denying a motion for a preference under subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the preference granted, without costs. Plaintiff established, prima facie, serious and protracted disability resulting from the claimed injuries. Despite such proof defendant did not oppose the motion nor offer any proof to dispute the nature or extent of the injuries. Accordingly, a preference is warranted. (Calanni v. Tranos, 12 A D 2d 762.) Appeal from the order entered September 29, 1959 denying the original motion for a preference is dismissed, without costs (Harris v. Brown, 93 N. Y. 390). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September 28, 1960 denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for reconsideration of an order denying a motion for a preference under subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the preference granted, without costs. Plaintiff established, prima facie, serious and protracted disability resulting from the claimed injuries. Despite such proof defendant did not oppose the motion nor offer any proof to dispute the nature or extent of the injuries. Accordingly, a preference is warranted. (Calanni v. Tranos, 12 A D 2d 762.) Appeal from the order entered September 29, 1959 denying the original motion for a preference is dismissed, without costs (Harris v. Brown, 93 N. Y. 390). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 480, 212 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-water-taxi-inc-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack