Epstein v. Totten
This text of 60 S.E. 614 (Epstein v. Totten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action of debt in the name of the State for the úse of Jacob Epstein against H. P. Totten and others, sureties in a sheriff’s bond. The case was tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict for the defendants. The judgment was only that the defendants recover of Epstein their costs. There was no judgment of nil capiat, that is, that the plaintiff take nothing b£ her suit. Eor want of a final judgment on the merits there is no jurisdiction for this writ of error, and therefore we dismiss it. Hannah v. Bank, 53 W. va. 82; Ritchie Bank v. Bee, 60 Id. 386; De Armit v. Town of Whitmer, decided 14th January, 1908.
Bismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 614, 63 W. Va. 602, 1908 W. Va. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-totten-wva-1908.