Epstein v. Thompson

289 S.W.3d 662, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 564, 2009 WL 1120163
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2009·No. ED 92206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M. Gary Epstein ("Epstein") appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motions to dismiss of Marion Thompson ("Thompson") and American Family Mutual Insurance Company ("American Family"). Epstein argues the trial court erred in dismissing his negli-genee claim against Thompson, and in dismissing his bad faith, fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligence claims against American Family.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epstein v. Thompson, 289 S.W.3d 662, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 564, 2009 WL 1120163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

289 S.W.3d 662 (Epstein v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stahlhuth v. SSM Healthcare of St. Louis
289 S.W.3d 662 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)