Epstein v. Solitron Devices, Inc.
388 F.2d 310
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 11, 1968·No. No. 263, Docket 31119·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm in open court the order of the Southern District denying a motion by Order to Show Cause by Solitron Devices, Inc., for an order directing plaintiff in a stockholder derivative action alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to post security for expenses pursuant to Section 627 of the New York Business Corporation Law, McKinneys’s Consol.Laws, c. 4, for the reasons stated in Judge Bonsai’s opinion. Weitzen v. Kearns, 262 F.Supp. 931 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epstein v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 388 F.2d 310 (2d Cir. 1968).
388 F.2d 310 (Epstein v. Solitron Devices, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
453 F.2d 722 (Second Circuit, 1972)