Epstein v. New York City Railway Co.
This text of 115 A.D. 904 (Epstein v. New York City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that upon the facts as claimed by the plaintiff that there was a presumption that the defendant'was guilty of negligence which it was called upon to rebut or overcome. -Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward,, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ.,. concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D. 904, 101 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-new-york-city-railway-co-nyappdiv-1906.