Epstein v. Mundweiler

127 A. 547, 97 N.J. Eq. 375, 12 Stock. 375, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van -Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, J'J. 14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epstein v. Mundweiler, 127 A. 547, 97 N.J. Eq. 375, 12 Stock. 375, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 547 (Epstein v. Mundweiler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melcer v. Zuck
245 A.2d 61 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Koperski v. Wira
129 A. 185 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)