Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Epstein v. Mundweiler

Epstein v. Mundweiler

127 A. 547, 97 N.J. Eq. 375, 12 Stock. 375, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 19, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 A. 547 (Epstein v. Mundweiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epstein v. Mundweiler, 127 A. 547, 97 N.J. Eq. 375, 12 Stock. 375, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536 (N.J. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van -Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, J'J. 14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melcer v. Zuck
245 A.2d 61 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Koperski v. Wira
129 A. 185 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 547, 97 N.J. Eq. 375, 12 Stock. 375, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-mundweiler-nj-1925.