Epstein v. Kutner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Epstein v. Kutner

38 A.D.2d 750, 329 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 750 (Epstein v. Kutner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epstein v. Kutner, 38 A.D.2d 750, 329 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover money damages and personal property upon various causes of action, including fraud and conversion, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 25, 1971, which granted Ms motion to open his default on the trial and to restore the ease to the Trial Calendar, upon certain conditions. Order modified by striking therefrom subparagraph “2” of the first decretal paragraph, namely, the condition that $50,000 or a surety bond be deposited in court, and by adding thereto a provision that the default judgment shall stand as security. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, imposition of the condition which is hereby stricken was an improvident exercise of discretion. This case should be tried without delay. [751]*751Hopkins, Acting P. J., Grulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover money damages and personal property upon various causes of action, including fraud and conversion, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 25, 1971, which granted Ms motion to open his default on the trial and to restore the ease to the Trial Calendar, upon certain conditions. Order modified by striking therefrom subparagraph “2” of the first decretal paragraph, namely, the condition that $50,000 or a surety bond be deposited in court, and by adding thereto a provision that the default judgment shall stand as security. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, imposition of the condition which is hereby stricken was an improvident exercise of discretion. This case should be tried without delay. [751]*751Hopkins, Acting P. J., Grulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 750, 329 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-kutner-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack