Epstein v. Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Epstein v. Kahn

215 A.D.2d 526, 627 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 526 (Epstein v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epstein v. Kahn, 215 A.D.2d 526, 627 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants Arthur M. Kahn, Richard Berg, Richard Berg, D.D.S., P. C., John Garizio, John Garizio, D.D.S., P. C., Kenneth D. Morris, and Kenneth D. Morris, D.D.S., P. C., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated May 4, 1994, which, upon renewal and reargument, vacated an order dated December 21, 1993, and granted the plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the appeals by the defendants Richard Berg, Richard Berg D.D.S., P. C., John Garizio, and John Garizio [527]*527D.D.S., P. C., are dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Arthur M. Kahn, Kenneth D. Morris, and Kenneth D. Morris, D.D.S., P. C., for reasons stated by Justice Brucia at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants Arthur M. Kahn, Richard Berg, Richard Berg, D.D.S., P. C., John Garizio, John Garizio, D.D.S., P. C., Kenneth D. Morris, and Kenneth D. Morris, D.D.S., P. C., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated May 4, 1994, which, upon renewal and reargument, vacated an order dated December 21, 1993, and granted the plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the appeals by the defendants Richard Berg, Richard Berg D.D.S., P. C., John Garizio, and John Garizio [527]*527D.D.S., P. C., are dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Arthur M. Kahn, Kenneth D. Morris, and Kenneth D. Morris, D.D.S., P. C., for reasons stated by Justice Brucia at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 526, 627 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1995.